Like most standards: "Because it's a standard". Kind of like setting a .body for a GET request, you can kind of do that, but why not do it the way it's intended to instead? Use POST :)
Sending a URL encoded form or some JSON in a POST request is also easier for most people to understand than the myriad ways you might format a query string in the URL (which may have a stricter limit on size).
You only have to look at how different services handle arrays in query strings to understand that serialising it is conceptually easier.
Comes up a lot in search or filter APIs. I'm sure there was some effort many moons ago to create a QUERY method for that.
Yeah, and also because of firewalls sometimes stripping body of GET requests (not responses mind you, we're talking requests) to a server, and also because it's really uncommon to put a body on a GET request ;)
A blast from the past. When Taskrabbit was acquired by IKEA, I built several tools that went through the whole catalog via various crawling approaches. One tool was to estimate how long it would be to put each item together for an initial training set.
There’s already a schema.org spec that defines a JSON-LD structured data that you can embed on every of your product page to provide a machine readable interface of your product.
That`s is valid for search engines. But if JSON-LD was sufficient for agents, Google wouldn't have launched UCP (Universal Commerce Protocol) yesterday.
True. But extracting that metadata requires parsing the full DOM. CommerceTXT is for efficient discovery. Scan inventory cheaply first, then commit to the transaction.
Interesting. I had been thinking recently about grep-friendly structured text file formats given the constraints of regex. But I hadn't considered that you could design a structured text file format to be LLM-friendly given token constraints.
I've heard that LLMs can perform worse with these more efficient representations compared to e.g. JSON, because they've seen far fewer examples of them during training. Do you know how true that is?
Interesting! So did you do any experiments on a relevant subset of the data to test whether LLM performance degrades by introducing a new, presumably unknown to the LLM, format?
years ago i did a small tool that, when you entered a product number, would scan all IKEA-websites with currency Euro and return the prices for each of them ; not that i expected furniture tourism to become a thing but it was funny
Huh? I don't think that's true, there usually is some sort of structural elements inside of the package, meant to be thrown away (usually made with cardboard/paper), and all Ikea boxes definitively have lots of air inside of them, not sure what would make you say otherwise, unless it's some joke I'm missing?
A box that contained a fully assembled kitchen table would contain a lot more air. I think that comment just meant IKEA designs items that can be packaged into a minimal volume.
Ah yes, on second reading it's actually pretty obvious that is what parent meant and I was reading it too literally. Thanks for the clarification, that's certainly correct :)
"OP here" is the funniest tell that shows up when using an LLM to write a post for HN or Reddit.
It's funny because it makes zero sense in the body of an initial post!
In comments replying to people downthread - maybe. But opening a top-level post with "Original Poster here" is just silly and shows a lack of respect for community etiquette.
These things should be put under /.well-known [1], not in the root.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Well-known_URI
It’s not ideal but representative of the tension between user experience and technical correctness.
You only have to look at how different services handle arrays in query strings to understand that serialising it is conceptually easier.
Comes up a lot in search or filter APIs. I'm sure there was some effort many moons ago to create a QUERY method for that.
For example, Google’s indexers already use this to surface pricing data. https://developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/structu...
JSON-LD is just read-only metadata for machines.
Or just a handy open data set you could use to prove out the concept?
Huh? I don't think that's true, there usually is some sort of structural elements inside of the package, meant to be thrown away (usually made with cardboard/paper), and all Ikea boxes definitively have lots of air inside of them, not sure what would make you say otherwise, unless it's some joke I'm missing?
It's funny because it makes zero sense in the body of an initial post!
In comments replying to people downthread - maybe. But opening a top-level post with "Original Poster here" is just silly and shows a lack of respect for community etiquette.
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=pastYear&page=0&prefix=tru...
>be me
Seeing it as a lack of respect is a huge stretch. And kinda conceited that you accuse someone of such, on the basis of a two word opener.