6 comments

  • soltanov 35 minutes ago
    Call me when peer review confirms it; until then, it is noise fitting noise. (Reason: Clean cut through the hype directly to scientific validation.)
  • ContinuityLab 24 minutes ago
    Cool discovery, but I'd be real curious about the false-positive rate when letting coding agents loose on raw astronomical telemetry. Hallucinations in data reduction are no joke.
    • pizza234 15 minutes ago
      From the discussion:

      > even got NASA to point a telescope at it for confirmation

    • phoronixrly 16 minutes ago
      Oh don't worry, after claude democratises astronomy the false positives will be cleaned up by the real astronomers. As seen in math and open-source development.

      This will be the first time I've had anything in common with a mathematician btw -- wading through heaps of claudeism-infested slop all day long.

  • higeorge13 1 hour ago
    This is incredible use of AI tools. Big kudos!
  • wartywhoa23 56 minutes ago
    Found a planet and saved a granny. Wake me up when this planet is acknowledged by any astonomer community with more say than r/ClaudeAI.
  • k310 52 minutes ago
    Planet Claude?

    Asking for a friend.

  • _fuchs 30 minutes ago
    So much AI in the writing. If you dont care to write i do not care to read.